On 13/11/12 10:51, Nicolas Froidure wrote: > So making datetime having the behavior of datetime-local does not seem > to be necessary for consistency. In any case, i think that we still need > a way to define a datetime in a particular timezone since you cited one > case in which it make sense.
Having *a* use case doesn't make a feature a must have. Developers can write this feature themselves and as said, having a browser implementation isn't going to help them here. It might be the opposite actually. > I think that whatever you decide for datetimes, it should always return > a UTC value with only one format (yyyy-mm-dd hh:mm:ss or > yyyy-mm-dd-Thh:mm:ssZ) to allow us to threat it the same way whether it > is relative to the user timezone or not. 'datetime' should indeed return something like "yyyy-mm-dd hh:mm:ss" so, there is no timezone involved. Cheers, -- Mounir
