On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 11:59 PM, Julian Reschke <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2012-12-04 08:40, Adam Barth wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Julian Reschke <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> On 2012-11-29 20:25, Adam Barth wrote: >>>> These are supported in Chrome. That's what causes the download. From >>> >>> Can you elaborate about what you mean by "supported"? Chrome sniffs for >>> the >>> type, and then offers to download as a result of that sniffing? How is >>> that >>> different from not sniffing in the first place? >> >> They might otherwise be treated as a type that can be displayed >> (rather than downloaded). Also, some user agents treat downloads of > > Do you have an example for that case? > >> ZIP archives differently than other sorts of download (e.g., they >> might offer to unzip them). > > Out of curiosity: which?
Safari. Adam
