On 16/12/12 2:05 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
There's no way to express that in WebIDL, but I think that's a bug we
should fix in WebIDL.  We should allow getters and setters for
attributes to accept different IDL types...

Yeah, that has come up a couple of times now. Filed https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=20407.

Reply via email to