On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 9:25 PM, Robert O'Callahan <[email protected]> wrote: > cloneNode() won't work for autorevoked URLs, because it is defined to only > clone attributes and children, not internal state (with a few exceptions > for Web compatibility). (Don't tell me that it shouldn't work that way; I > argued that long ago and lost :-).)
We explicitly allow for it today. http://dom.spec.whatwg.org/#concept-node-clone-ext That was added of course for the compatibility reasons you mention (mostly form controls) but I don't see why at this point in time we should still avoid using it for other means. -- http://annevankesteren.nl/
