On Apr 9, 2013, at 16:17 , Rik Cabanier <[email protected]> wrote: > I like the following naming scheme, as it is really short and already > familiar for people from the Java world, but I can imagine that a prefix > would be preferred. > > Path2D, Shape2D, Gradient2D, Matrix2D > > Path2d and Shape2d sound reasonable. I don't think there's a immediate need > to harmonize gradients so we probably want to keep CanvasGradient.
Do you prefer the lowercase 'd' instead of the uppercase 'D'? I think most acronyms in JS are uppercased (e.g. JSON), so the latter seems more aligned with convention. And what is required to get such a proposal through? I really think using 'Path' as a new global constructor at this point is a bad idea, and could cause quite a bit of trouble with apps out there. Jürg
