On Tue, 5 Feb 2013, Nathan Broadbent wrote: > > The current information passed to window.onerror rarely provides > sufficient information to find the cause of the error. The column number > argument will be a big step forward, but a stack trace would be > especially useful. I would like to add my support for improving the > window.onerror arguments, with a fifth argument for stack trace. Is > there anything that James or I could do to move this discussion along?
This seems useful, but I don't think it's specific to window.onerror. I would recommend approaching the es-discuss list about this. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
