On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Peter Kasting <[email protected]> wrote: > I don't see this as a security risk, and if the behavior is desirable, it > seems fairly well-scoped in terms of specifying it.
For now I've not done this because it would mean that purported absolute URLs would not round trip. "file:c:..." is treated as an absolute path now though (rather than one relative to the base's path as it was before). -- http://annevankesteren.nl/
