On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 4:21 PM, Chang Shu <[email protected]> wrote: > If we plan to enhance the Encoding spec, I personally prefer a new pair of
BinaryDecoder/BinaryEncoder, which will be less confusing than reusing > TextDecoder/TextEncoder. > I disagree with the idea of adding a new method for something that behaves exactly like something we already have, just to give it a different name. (It may not be too late to rename those functions, if nobody has implemented them yet, but I'm not convinced it's much of a problem.) -- Glenn Maynard
