On Wed, 21 Aug 2013, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > > Hmm, specifying the static position probably does work, at least from > the spec standpoint.
Ok. Do let me know if there are problems I didn't see that would lead us to doing it differently. > > Hm, yeah, what I really meant was width:shrink-to-wrap. Is there a CSS > > value to explicitly select that yet? > > Yes, fit-content <http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-sizing/#fit-content>. Thanks. Done. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
