On Wed, 11 Sep 2013, Rik Cabanier wrote: > On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 11:24 AM, Ian Hickson <i...@hixie.ch> wrote: > > On Wed, 11 Sep 2013, Robert O'Callahan wrote: > > > > > > Pinch-zoom is hard because we don't want to trigger reflows or other > > > expensive behavior on pinch-zoom. I'd leave pinch-zoom out of it for > > > now. > > > > Unless I'm missing something fundamental, changing the pixel density > > doesn't cause a layout, it's changing the width that causes a layout. > > It will do a layout if the width is directly or indirectly dependent on > the CSS pixelratio. For instance, notice how the text boxes reflow if > you change the page zoom: http://jsfiddle.net/BtAK7/1/
Sure. But pinch-zoom doesn't change the width. (Page zoom does.) -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'