On 13/09/2013 13:31 , Jirka Kosek wrote:
On 13.9.2013 12:10, Robin Berjon wrote:
I would rather we figured this out without <link>, but apart from the
indirection I reckon this approach has some nice properties and might
work if more direct ones don't.
Also don't forget that while linking is the hardest part of this ZIP
circus there is another missing piece -- normative definition of
portable and RF subset of ZIP. SC34 started some initial work on such
ZIP profile recently:
http://www.itscj.ipsj.or.jp/sc34/open/1855.pdf
So if some sort of ZIP packaging spec should to appear then it should
reference such subset of ZIP not the full definition of ZIP format from
PKWare.
This has also been done, perhaps not to a sufficient extent, in Widgets:
http://www.w3.org/TR/widgets/#zip-archive
--
Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
