On Thu, 10 Oct 2013 17:52:49 +0200, Glenn Adams <[email protected]> wrote:
You'd actually write "CSS.escape", so that's basically the longer,
different name. Is that sufficient?
I don't want to bikeshed over this, but I was thinking of perhaps
serializeIdent(), or escapeIdent().
The API is intended to be used for escaping CSS strings too. Also, I think
most Web developers don't think in terms of CSS tokens.
Serialize seems a bit wrong since the input isn't an object.
--
Simon Pieters
Opera Software
