On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 12:32 PM, Yoav Weiss <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 8:58 PM, Jonas Sicking <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 2:40 AM, James Graham <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > This ugliness creates real issues e.g. if I have src-1, src-2 [...] and I >> > decide I want a rule that is consulted between src-1 and src-2, I need to >> > rewrite all my attribute names. Whilst this might produce a pleasant >> rush of >> > nostalgia for children of the 80s brought up on 8-bit Basic, for everyone >> > else it seems like an error-prone drag. >> >> So all we need to do is to define that you don't have to use a >> continuous numbered set. I.e. skipping numbers would be allowed. >> >> So people can do >> <img src-10="..." src-20="..."> >> >> Then if you need to insert a attribute, you simply do >> >> <img src-10="..." src-15="..." src-20="..."> > > That is actually already part of the spec (implicitly), for that exact > reason.
Well, not for that reason, but it does allow that usage if you want. (I did it because it's an authoring hazard if deleting an attribute means all src-Ns with higher numbers get ignored.) ~TJ
