Am 20.11.2013 06:24 schrieb Bruno Racineux:
On 11/19/13 12:12 PM, "Ian Hickson" <[email protected]> wrote:
On Tue, 19 Nov 2013, Markus Ernst wrote:
I can't recall the reasons why Florian's proposal of combining
<picture>
and @srcset fell out of the discussion. To me it still looks like the
most useable draft so far.
I responsed to proposals along those lines last year:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-whatwg-archive/2012Aug/0070.htm
l
Search for "multi-element" for the specific response to proposals that
involve multiple elements.
There are other concerns against any non-centralized approaches like
<picture>.
[...]
Any author used to the flexibility of css shouldn't have the burden to
deal with hard-coded unalterable stuff like that. It's as bad as an inline
css-style to deal with.
I do totally agree with you. AFAICS, all proposals with a significant
amount of support (picture, srcset, src-N) share this problem. I don't
have the impression that adding centralization has much support right
now. Anyway, once there is a consent about the respImg syntax, it may be
easier to propose a centralisation mechanism at the CSS side, e.g. some
variable or constant useable in the MQ.
