Hmm; I wasn't thinking in terms of per-device, only per-origin and per-browser/machine. Seems like a conversation for public-media-capture?
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 3:30 PM, Philip Jägenstedt <phil...@opera.com>wrote: > On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 5:51 AM, Ami Fischman <fisch...@chromium.org> > wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 8:47 PM, Philip Jägenstedt <phil...@opera.com> > > wrote: > > [...] > > > >> Do you mean to make this per-origin as well? (It will require storing > >> that information per-origin forever, or until some invisible timeout.) > >> That seems about as restrictive as one could make it, but is the API > >> going to actually be useful in this state? > > > > > > Sure, why not? > > Canonical use-case: webrtc-using video-chat webapp allows the user to > select > > between speakers, wired headset, or bluetooth headset for its audio > output; > > the webapp already has gUM permission so now it can use > getMediaDevices() to > > enumerate output sinks and use the proposal here to route the remote > audio > > feed to the desired device. > > OK, so a site that has been given access to any device using > getUserMedia can then enumerate all devices using getMediaDevices? I > interpreted "devices to which the user has already granted access > through getUserMedia" in the most restrictive (per-origin, per-device) > way possible... > > Philip >