On Thu, 23 Jan 2014, Simon Sapin wrote: > > To help with "discoverability" of obsolete features by implementers, I’d > like them to be included in the Index section’s tables.
They're explicitly excluded to help with avoiding their discovery by authors. There's a link from any interface that has obsolete IDL members to the partial interface that defines those members. As far as non-obsolete elements go, I think the only requirements in the obsolete section are regarding these obsolete IDL members. > When considering what Servo should implement, I mistakenly concluded > that <li> elements do not have a 'type' attribute, based on the Index. > They in fact do, as specified in the Obsolete features section. Do you mean a type IDL attribute or a type content attribute? No IDL attributes are listed in the index. I don't know what it really means for an element to have a content attribute, from an implement's persective. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
