On 12/03/2014 10:04, David Håsäther wrote:
I would like to propose making the `value` argument optional for
URLSearchParams set()[1]. This would work as set("name", ""), but
would not output the equals sign, leading to nicer URLs.

So:

set("name", "") -> "?name="
set("name") -> "?name"

Anne van Kesteren pointed out[2] that this is different from the
application/x-www-form-urlencoded serialization on which it currently
relies on. I'm not sure if that has any implications.

[1]http://url.spec.whatwg.org/#dom-urlsearchparams-set
[2]https://twitter.com/annevk/status/443576248166391808

Currently the application/x-www-form-urlencoded serializer takes a list of name-value pairs, where the name and the value are implied to be strings. We could change it to accept values that are null as well as strings. A pair with a null value would be serialized as just the name, without the equal sign.

So you could end up with  ?name1=value1&name2&name3=value3

HTML forms would just provide lists of pairs that never happen to include a null value.


The parser currently emits an empty strings when the input is missing an equal sign for a given pair. Assuming the above, I don’t know if it should be changed to emit a null value.

--
Simon Sapin

Reply via email to