On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 9:27 PM, Boris Zbarsky <bzbar...@mit.edu> wrote:
> On 7/2/14, 3:21 PM, Rik Cabanier wrote: > >> facts = 2 implementations. I certainly didn't say anything else. >> > > You said, and I quote: > > > That thread concluded with a "let's see how this feature is going to > be used before we commit". > ah, I see now that he responded to my second message. Yes, I was off on there. > Anyway, 2 implementations is a necessary condition for a REC, not a > sufficient one. This is from the WHATWG site: http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/FAQ#Is_there_a_process_for_adding_new_features_to_a_specification.3F The WHATWG doesn't have a hard requirement for 2 implementations but it certainly is an indication that it should be more than just a wiki.
