Le 13/05/2014 18:21, Ian Hickson a écrit :
On Tue, 13 May 2014, Dirk Schulze wrote:
contentEditable can be fairly useful in SVG as well. It partly works for
inline SVG content in web browsers today.
The question is, should SVGElement add support for
contentEditable/isContentEditable and add it to its interface? Or should
both attributes move to the Element interface instead?
I would be very careful about moving global attributes to Element. Doing
so implies that we are adding them to _all_ XML namespaces. That's a huge
change to propose. Even with "class" it's IMHO going a bit far (we're
saying that the semantics of <myvocab:teacher class="..."/> are that it's
a space-separate list of CSS class names, even if the vocab designer
intended it to be a room name or whatever).
I would feel more comfortable putting things on SVG, MathML, and HTML
explicitly.
It might make sense to split the current HTMLElement interface and
create a partial interface so it can be more easily reused in SVG and
MathML.
Filed https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26329 for that purpose.
David
