On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 9:06 AM, Anne van Kesteren <ann...@annevk.nl> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 2:56 PM, Peter Beverloo <bever...@google.com> wrote: >> One argument I came across for overloading requestPermission is the >> following: >> Promise.all([ Notification.requestPermission(), >> swRegistration.push.requestPermission() ]).then(...); >> >> Might be worth considering, it's relatively cheap to support and can be >> implemented without breaking backwards compatibility. > > One minor risk with also returning a promise is that exceptions for > incorrect invocation would no longer throw an exception, but instead > reject the promise. > > Otherwise I would never expect this promise to be rejected as the user > declining notifications is not exceptional.
Wait, what? Anytime you request something, not getting it is exceptional. Not sure how you can make an argument otherwise. ~TJ
