Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoe...@gmx.net> writes: > * Glen Huang wrote: >>When someone says A replace B, I get the impression that B is no longer >>in effect and A is the new one. So when I do `node1.replace(node2)`, I >>can’t help but feel node2 is replaced with node1, which is the opposite >>of what the spec specifies. > > To illustrate this, imagine some team sports game where the coach jells > "Jane, replace John!", in other words, `Jane.replace(John)`. It is clear > that Jane is instructed to take the position of John.
To elaborate on this a bit: “Jane.replace(John)” takes Jane as the first (implicit) argument and John as the second (explicit), so I read it like “replace Jane and John”. This may look ambiguous – until you remember who is instructed to to the replacement, namely Jane. -- Nils Dagsson Moskopp // erlehmann <http://dieweltistgarnichtso.net>
