On 2015-03-20 21:13, Bobby Mozumder wrote:
>> On Mar 20, 2015, at 7:12 AM, Jens Oliver Meiert <j...@meiert.com> wrote: So >> it's already possible, right? :) > > Maybe, with a lot of expensive Javascript coding. Of course, anything is > possible with a lot of expensive coding. The goal should be to make it > simple. That's why Facebook has 1.5 billion users while there are only a few > hundred thousand front-end Javascript framework developers. > >> Even if HTML would accommodate, how would we know we're not just moving >> complexity from one end to the other? Would we want that? Why? * > > The goal should be to make things simpler, not more complex. People should > pick up on it quickly. Were you able to pick up on my example quickly? How > long would it take to learn a Javascript framework? > > At the very least, the entire goal is to have browsers, by default & > out-of-the-box, be able to serve pages as fast as possible. You're competing > against native apps that already do so, and you're losing. Those 10s of > milliseconds are important to the user. > > -bobby > --- > > I do not catch the simil between an app (Facebook) vs. the future of HTML6, > my excuses. I do not remember neither hold the notion that the needs of HTML5 > were build due to the highest succes of the MySpace platform, during those > early days. > > I do no think that account number of users may define any standard, mainly > because of the audience (user) are just this, audience. > > I like the idea and the schema to simplify and avoid unnecessary frameworks, > but this should be implemented in a higher level, i.e the DOM. > > Time to render apps or pages does not depend only on the ability of the > developer, but on the will of the companies that provide access to the net. > So the simpler, the better, for we cannot presume of the values of lenght and > latence by the services provided by this companies, when we are connecting > through an external service. > > For Intranets, the present model works quite good. And your proposal soounds > brilliant to me. > > I am thinking now on the SMTP/Mail protocol scenario, not yet abbandoned, and > I guess that will be a good start to decide means for future goals. > > Best > > --- > [1] > > Delfi Ramirez > > My digital signature [2] > > +34 633 589231 > del...@segonquart.net [3] > > twitter: delfinramirez > > IRC: segonquart Skype: segonquart [4] > > http://segonquart.net [5] > > http://delfiramirez.info [6] > > /in/mozumder [1]> Links: ------ [1] http://www.linkedin.com/in/mozumder [2] http://delfiramirez.info/public/dr_public_key.asc [3] mail:%20del...@segonquart.net [4] skype:segonquart [5] http://segonquart.net [6] http://delfiramirez.info
