On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 1:51 PM Anne van Kesteren <ann...@annevk.nl> wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 7:49 PM, Jonas Sicking <jo...@sicking.cc> wrote: > > I think we've already made that assumption given that history.state > > already relies on this. > > Good point. I'm still somewhat skeptical of introducing new objects > just for the purpose of grouping some properties if they don't serve a > purpose on their own. > It is only used as way to group properties (perhaps similar to ValidityState?) and to keep History interface clean and stack-like. If that is not valuable enough to introduce a new interface then putting these on the History interface is fine. Majid
