On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 9:27 AM, Justin Novosad <ju...@google.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 2:38 PM, Ashley Gullen <ash...@scirra.com> wrote:
> > ImageBitmap is not useful for getting the data from: it still requires
> > synchronous use of a canvas to turn in to an ImageData. I would encourage
> > browser vendors to look at my spec proposal to avoid this:
> > http://wicg.github.io/img-conversion/
> Yes, that is on our radar. We need APIs to move image data without making
> so many intermediate copies in RAM. AFAIK, this appears to be a real
> problem for image manipulation apps, which tend to quickly run out of RAM.
> ImageBitmap partially addresses this, but it does little for apps that need
> to do direct image data manipulation.


lbir ye,ea yer.tnietoehr  rdn rdsme,anea lurpr  edna e hnysnenh hhe uresyf
selthor  stor  edna  siewaoeodm  or v sstvr  esBa  kbvted,t
o l euetiuruewFa  kbn e hnystoivateweh uresyf tulsa rehr  rdm  or rnea
.a war hsrer holsa rodvted,t  nenh hneireseoouot.tniesiewaoeivatewt sstvr

Reply via email to