On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 10:53 PM, Boris Zbarsky <bzbar...@mit.edu> wrote:

> On 12/1/16 1:41 AM, Chris Holland wrote:
>> I think the devil would be in implementation detail. Slapping a
>> "rel/noopener" attribute on a specific link is very deterministic and
>> straightforward from a logic standpoint ---- Whichever window was created
>> from this link can't control the parent.
> It's a much stronger guarantee.  The guarantee is that the parent and the
> created window have no way to see each other at all.  Neither one can read
> any state from the other, or even know the other one exists.
> In particular, the idea is that rel="noopener" allows the new window to be
> opened in a separate process, or even a separate browser if desired. The
> only difference between it and the user copying the link and then pasting
> it into some other tab or other program is that a referrer header is sent.
> Note that this guarantee makes for fairly simple implementation.
> Having a header that opts in all links targeted at anything other than
> _parent, _self, and _top have the noopener behavior would be doable. Having
> a header that opts in some links based on the origin of the link href or
> something would probably be doable.  Having a header that tries to add some
> sort of new mode wherein the two windows _can_ see each other but can't do
> some things that they can normally do would be a snake pit of complexity
> that is best avoided.

I would like us to think about adding a mode where you get a MessageChannel
between the two windows. There's no synchronous access, and no ability to
navigate it, but you can talk back and forth with it.

> -Boris

Reply via email to