On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 12:57 PM, Robert T. McGibbon <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hey guys, > > Sorry I'm out of the loop. Nathaniel correctly diagnosed the problem as > thesis stuff. Quick responses below: > > > 1. With SOABI tag support now available for Python 2.X, would a PR > adding UCS-2 builds of Python to the docker image be accepted? > > +1 from me. I think there's an issue open for this. You just need to > decide something rational for the directory layout of which Python goes > where and what the symlinks will be. > > I think this will also require getting the UCS-2 detection code properly > removed from auditwheel (https://github.com/pypa/auditwheel/pull/17). > Sorry I haven't done that yet. > Okay, I'll get going on these. > > 2. Is anyone working on the pip side of the changes necessary to > install manylinux1 wheels? If not, I'll do this. > > IIRC, there is an open PR to pip (https://github.com/pypa/pip/pull/3497). > I think adding your voice there might help move it along. I think that PR > is ready to merge, but just lacking the last necessary push from a pip > maintainer to merge it. > > > > Also, I wonder if we should vendor auditwheel into wheel itself so you > can directly build manylinux1 wheels. > > IMO it's too early for that. auditwheel is not mature, and besides you > really need the docker env. On that note, any help getting auditwheel in > better shape -- especially UX-wise if you have any free cycles -- would be > totally awesome. > What do you have in mind? --nate
_______________________________________________ Wheel-builders mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/wheel-builders
