Concerning OpenBLAS: as there is a lot of ongoing work at OpenBLAS develop I think it is worth to discuss https://github.com/xianyi/OpenBLAS /issues/783#issuecomment-190457525 and https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues/5479#issuecomment-184472378 and potentially other bugs with in a seperate OpenBLAS issue with the OpenBLAS developers.
OpenBLAS is the most promising free and optimized implementation today. ATLAS *may *be used in future for 32bit, as OpenBLAS won't get new assembler kernels for x86 (32bit Intel) anymore (@wernsaar, priv. comm.). For 64bit architectures the picture is different. It would be unfortunate to refuse OpenBLAS due to this. Carl 2016-03-08 3:34 GMT+01:00 Nathaniel Smith <[email protected]>: > I guess ATLAS? > On Mar 7, 2016 5:50 PM, "Matthew Brett" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 5:27 PM, Nathaniel Smith <[email protected]> wrote: >> > On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 12:33 PM, Matthew Brett <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> What about the problems with openblas? Should we instead get a wheel >> >> out with embedded ATLAS? >> > >> > Probably this is a discussion for the numpy list rather than >> > wheel-builders, but I'd definitely vote for doing the same thing on as >> > many platforms as possible. Trying to simultaneously support ATLAS on >> > Windows + Accelerate on OSX + OpenBLAS on Linux is just silly :-). >> >> But - specifically - do you think we should use ATLAS or OpenBLAS on >> manylinux...? >> >> Matthew >> > > _______________________________________________ > Wheel-builders mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/wheel-builders > >
_______________________________________________ Wheel-builders mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/wheel-builders
