Hello, wheel builders! I had a chat with Geoffrey Thomas about the particulars of symbol versioning and he reminded me that you all would be interested in a successor to manylinux1.
Here's the PEP so far: https://github.com/python/peps/blob/master/pep-0571.rst And the associated distutils-sig thread: https://mail.python.org/pipermail/distutils-sig/2018-February/031944.html (note I sent the first email twice from two different addresses :( The text of the PEP is the same, so you only have to read one!) And here are the PRs: https://github.com/pypa/manylinux/pull/152 https://github.com/pypa/auditwheel/pull/88 https://github.com/pypa/pip/pull/5008 I put initial Docker images up here if you'd like to repair a wheel or two: https://hub.docker.com/r/markrwilliams/manylinux2/ Highlights from the distutils-sig thread and pypa/manylinux PR so far: - Should `manylinux` use CalVer (http://calver.org) ? - Can the next `manylinux` use newer compilers than `manylinux1` without implying backwards incompatibilities? (The answer is yes - explanation forthcoming, thanks to Geoffrey for the help!) - Should the next `manylinux` drop support for i686? Please feel free to join the discussion on distutils-sig or comment on the various PRs. I look forward to collaborating with everybody! -- Mark Williams m...@twistedmatrix.com _______________________________________________ Wheel-builders mailing list Wheel-builders@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/wheel-builders