Thanks for the tip. I ended up installing cmake using pip in the base image. I also recognize my mistake with the -L flag in my current command now.
Boost is building now, I see the light at the end of the tunnel. Could it be? My first ever manylinux wheel 😱😱😱 On Thu, Oct 11, 2018, 9:57 AM Jean-Christophe Fillion-Robin < j...@kitware.com> wrote: > Hi Jariullah, > > I confirm that running the following works: > > docker pull quay.io/pypa/manylinux1_x86_64 > docker run -ti --rm quay.io/pypa/manylinux1_x86_64 bash > > Then run > > curl -#LO > https://dl.bintray.com/boostorg/release/1.68.0/source/boost_1_68_0.tar.gz > > > This means that integrated similar command in your dockerfile should also > work. > > > > As a side note, if you would like to build software and ensure tools like > cmake, ninja, etc .. are available. You could look at dockcross/manylinux > images. See https://github.com/dockcross/dockcross#readme > > > Hth > Jc > > > > On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 12:51 PM Jariullah Safi <safij...@isu.edu> wrote: > >> So looks like I need to build boost as the version available in the >> centos 5 repos is too old, which is fine, but apparently there is no wget >> and I can't for the life of me get curl to download the tar.gz of boost >> source code. I'm currently cloning it but given the submodule nature of >> boost and the large size of that source code it's taking a very long time. >> >> Is there a way to get wget back? What's the recommended method of getting >> dependencies like this into the container? Should I be copying them from my >> filesystem? >> >> On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 8:07 AM Jariullah Safi <safij...@isu.edu> wrote: >> >>> That's a fair point. I tried that a bit before but was getting too >>> befuddled. I'll give it another shot. >>> >>> I've used Docker a fair aamount before but I'm brand new to CentOS 5 >>> (which feels very ironic given how old it is 😅). I'm likely going to >>> stumble a fair amount trying to get all my dependencies in place and >>> building. Is this the best venue to ask for help during that process or is >>> there a more appropriate one? I'm worried about creating too much noise in >>> the mailing list. >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Oct 10, 2018, 3:35 PM Elana Hashman <el...@hashman.ca> wrote: >>> >>>> Why don't you put the build steps in your Dockerfile rather than trying >>>> to figure it out in interactive mode? That will let you cache layers, too. >>>> >>>> *From:* safij...@isu.edu >>>> *Sent:* October 10, 2018 6:23 PM >>>> *To:* n...@pobox.com >>>> *Cc:* wheel-builders@python.org >>>> *Subject:* Re: [Wheel-builders] manylinux1 vm image >>>> >>>> No I'm on Linux, just weary of docker interactive mode 😅 >>>> >>>> On Wed, Oct 10, 2018, 3:01 PM Nathaniel Smith <n...@pobox.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I'm not aware of such a thing, no. But... I guess you must be asking >>>>> because you want to work with the image on Windows or macOS? I believe >>>>> both >>>>> of them have easy-to-install docker support, which will take care of >>>>> setting up a VM internally and then running any docker image you want on >>>>> that VM. >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Oct 10, 2018, 14:43 Jariullah Safi <safij...@isu.edu> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> Is there a prebuilt vmware or virtualbox image similar to the >>>>>> manylinux1 docker image? I need to do some experimentation to figure out >>>>>> how to get all of my package's dependencies in place and having a VM >>>>>> would >>>>>> make the discovery somewhat easier. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> >>>>>> Jari >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Wheel-builders mailing list >>>>>> Wheel-builders@python.org >>>>>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/wheel-builders >>>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >> Wheel-builders mailing list >> Wheel-builders@python.org >> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/wheel-builders >> >
_______________________________________________ Wheel-builders mailing list Wheel-builders@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/wheel-builders
