Also to ensure nothing link against Python, you could set PYTHON_LIBRARY CMake cache variable to an empty file with a meaningful name (for example /path/to libpython-not-needed-symbols-exported-by-interpreter), this would allow to catch where weak linking is missing.
For an example, see here <https://github.com/InsightSoftwareConsortium/ITKPythonPackage/blob/9b799f01297e475f44e100fd2afd6b13b5ccb869/scripts/macpython-build-common.sh#L33-L47> On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 9:52 AM Jean-Christophe Fillion-Robin < j...@kitware.com> wrote: > Hi Matt, > > (1) On linux, you should not link against the library. For that reason, it > is not available in manylinux. > > To provide some background: > > ----------------- > Since the python interpreter exports its symbol (see [1]), python modules > should not link against any python libraries. > To ensure it is not the case, we configure the project using an empty file > as python library. > > [1] "Note that libpythonX.Y.so.1 is not on the list of libraries that a > manylinux1 extension is allowed to link to. Explicitly linking to > libpythonX.Y.so.1 is unnecessary in almost all cases: the way ELF linking > works, extension modules that are loaded into the interpreter automatically > get access to all of the interpreter's symbols, regardless of whether or > not the extension itself is explicitly linked against libpython. [...]" > > Source: https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0513/#libpythonx-y-so-1 > ----------------- > > > > (2) Updated CMake > > While this would not solve this particular problem, there are python > wheels available for CMake. > See https://pypi.org/pypi/cmake/ > > And also for ninja build tool (quite usual for automatic parallelization > of the build). Note that the version distributed on pypi is patched > <https://github.com/kitware/ninja#readme> version that include the > jobserver capability as well as as fortran support . > See https://pypi.org/project/ninja/ > > > (3) Streamlined build > > I suggest you look into scikit-build, this provide a nice integration of > CMake and python setuptools. > See http://scikit-build.readthedocs.io/ > > > (4) CI and upload to PyPI > > For an example of project, consider looking at > https://github.com/amueller/word_cloud > > > Hth > Jc > > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 9:41 AM Clarkson, Matt <m.clark...@ucl.ac.uk> > wrote: > >> Hi there, >> >> If someone could help me, I would be eternally grateful. >> >> I'm currently creating: >> https://github.com/MattClarkson/CMakeCatchTemplate >> >> as a template project, from which others can generate their own C++ >> CMake, Catch, CTest project, and I'm providing support for building >> Boost.Python, PyBind11, and hence wheels, via Appveyor, and Travis, via >> manylinux. >> >> I'm currently on Issue #45, and branch: 45-pypi, and the Travis log looks >> like it's working: >> https://travis-ci.com/MattClarkson/CMakeCatchTemplate/builds/98215507 >> >> However, if you look at a Linux build, for example: >> https://travis-ci.com/MattClarkson/CMakeCatchTemplate/jobs/172197399 >> >> and line 599, we see that CMake is finding the right python executable, >> and the right python include dir, but picking up /usr/lib64/libpython2.4 >> instead of the required version 3.5.5. This means, when I pip install on >> another independent machine, downloading the wheel from pypi, I get a >> library not found error. I should say at this point, that I'm actually >> using the opencv-python docker image provided here: >> quay.io/skvark/manylinux, but this is essentially the same as manylinux, >> with these additions: >> https://github.com/skvark/opencv-python/tree/master/docker, but from a >> python perspective, its the same. >> >> So, my question (as I currently know almost nothing about docker): >> >> a) Does the docker image have all python libraries installed? If so, >> where are they? Is it worth trying to coax cmake 3.9 to find the right one? >> At the moment I do not yet know (and have limited time today), if I can run >> or log into the docker container to find the libraries. >> >> b) Or do we just create our own docker image, with a more up to date >> version of cmake? >> >> If you have any advice, I'd be grateful, as I'm new to wheel building. >> >> Thanks >> >> Matt >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wheel-builders mailing list >> Wheel-builders@python.org >> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/wheel-builders >> >
_______________________________________________ Wheel-builders mailing list Wheel-builders@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/wheel-builders