Tom were you still planning to do 91? If not lmk and I'll take a stab at it. I'd like to get an RC built asap.
Thanks, Patrick On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 2:30 PM, Patrick Hunt <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 1:24 PM, Tom White <[email protected]> wrote: >> Do you think WHIRR-116 is a blocker too? > > I don't think so given the docs are available in the releases > themselves. Would be nice to have at some point though. > > I do notice that it's > http://incubator.apache.org/whirr/quick-start-guide.html > rather than say whirr/docs/current/... which would facilitate having > multiple versions under docs with current being a symbolic link to the > most recent stable release docs. I'll update the jira. > > Patrick > >>> >>> Patrick >>> >>> On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Tom White <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> +1 >>>> >>>> Thanks for volunteering to be the release manager! >>>> >>>> It would be nice to fix all four, but I agree that only WHIRR-91 is a >>>> blocker. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Tom >>>> >>>> On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 10:32 AM, Patrick Hunt <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> Hi Folks, do you think it's a good time for a 0.2.0 release? 21 issues >>>>> fixed so far, 4 open. Only one of those seems like it would be good to >>>>> fix before 0.2.0 >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIRR-91 >>>>> >>>>> In particular updating to the new jclouds and addressing the AMI issue >>>>> (107) seems worthy of a new release. >>>>> >>>>> I'd be happy to serve as release manager if everyone else is too busy. :-) >>>>> >>>>> Patrick >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
