Hi Andrei,

My major concern will be full HBase support, for CDH, 0.90.x and
onwards, Hadoop Append and so on.

I like to hear from others though about your thoughts. I am happy to
discuss them but do not have a strong opinion at the moment. Adding
more services is a great idea, this will show the versatility and
raise interest. As for the cloud providers, what is left? Which one
are not not supported yet but you think should? Which have missing
features (if there are any missing ones)?

How is using the Python scripts? I would add a deprecation warning in
0.5.0 and then remove it in the 0.6.0. - though they are outdated it
does not really ask for a quick removal. Unless there is no one using
it and then it could be dropped right away, no?

I would love to volunteer as release manager but honestly am in the
trenches writing the HBase book. So I would then do the one after
that. I certainly +1 your suggestion and seeing the awesome job you
have done this release I would love to see you handle another one :)

Lars

On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 12:22 PM, Andrei Savu <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> How about doing some planning for 0.5.0?
>
> Some questions I'm thinking about:
> - Should we focus on adding more services or on adding more cloud providers?
> - Are there any JIRAs that we need to address as soon as possible?
> - What's your short list of changes for 0.5.0?
> - Should we have some sort of strategy for promoting the project so
> that we can attract different communities to add services to Whirr?
> - Is this the right moment to remove the Python contrib or we should
> wait for one more release?
>
> In the near future I'm going to work on making Whirr more useful for
> build artefacts testing (e.g. automatic local file uploads to blob
> stores) and on Puppet integration.
>
> If we are aiming to release 0.5.0 by the end of June and no one else
> wants / has time to be a release manager I could do this one more
> time. For the next 3 months I'm going to work mostly on Whirr.
>
> Cheers,
>
> -- Andrei Savu / andreisavu.ro
>

Reply via email to