On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 9:28 AM, Andrei Savu <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 7:23 PM, Adrian Cole <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I like the sandbox concept, as this is more about them being
>> unfinished then something that we wouldn't pull in.
>
> Yes and we should be able to change the core without having to update
> all the services to support the new features (e.g rolling restarts,
> reconfiguration).
>
> Should we add something like a supported list of Whirr capabilities
> for each service?
+1

Reply via email to