[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIRR-315?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Andrei Savu updated WHIRR-315:
------------------------------

    Description: Provider#withIds is expecting a provider specific ID. This 
problem is fixed in jclouds-beta-10. This issue adds a temporary override. 
computerService.destroyNode works as expected.   (was: I realized that I have 
to use AWSUtills in order to handle instances IDs correctly. It looks like 
inconsistent behavior in jclouds. 

>From the documentation I would expect to be able to call:
{code}
computeService.destroyNode(metadata.getId())
{code}
but I have to do the following call in order to get the expected behavior:
{code}
computeService.destroyNode(AWSUtils.parseHandle(metadata.getId())[1]);
{code}

Adrian, am I missing something about how jclouds handles instance IDs?
)
        Summary: Temporary override Providers#withIds until jclouds beta-10 is 
out  (was: Use AWSUtils to handle instance IDs )

Updated issue title and description to match the patch. 

> Temporary override Providers#withIds until jclouds beta-10 is out
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: WHIRR-315
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIRR-315
>             Project: Whirr
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Andrei Savu
>            Assignee: Andrei Savu
>             Fix For: 0.6.0
>
>         Attachments: WHIRR-315.patch, WHIRR-315.patch, WHIRR-315.patch
>
>
> Provider#withIds is expecting a provider specific ID. This problem is fixed 
> in jclouds-beta-10. This issue adds a temporary override. 
> computerService.destroyNode works as expected. 

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to