+1
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 9:09 AM, Tom White <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 to requiring Maven 3. > > Tom > > On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 9:01 AM, Andrei Savu <[email protected]> wrote: >> There are some build problems that can't be solved easily in a manner >> that works both with maven 2 & maven 3 [1] >> >> I suggest we should support only maven 3. What do you think? >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIRR-352 >> >> -- Andrei Savu / andreisavu.ro >> >
