Guillaume, many thanks for your answer. But:
Le 9 mai 2014 à 16:22, Guillaume Melquiond <guillaume.melqui...@inria.fr> a écrit : >> 2- is it fair to use Classical logic in the Coq stubs translated from Why3 >> goals/lemmas ? > > Yes, it is fair, since the logic of Why3 already assumes it. > > In practice, I never had to assume it though, when doing a Coq proof. Indeed, > most of the predicates I get from Why3 are trivially boolean in nature, and > thus do not need excluded middle. what do you mean by "most of the predicates I get from Why3 are trivially boolean in nature" ? In the Coq files that I get from Why3, I see Coq ‘Prop’s translated from Why3 predicates!! -JJ- _______________________________________________ Why3-club mailing list Why3-club@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/why3-club
