[ 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-8?page=comments#action_12443314 ] 
            
Alastair Maw commented on WICKET-8:
-----------------------------------

If you just open the page in a single Firefox, loading up the images is 
generally enough to trigger the problem, but I've create a App1Test3 and 
ResourceTestPage in threadtest which demonstrates this problem clearly. Eelco's 
kindly committed it.

fwiw, ivaynberg's also running into this right now.

> deadlock contention for sessions
> --------------------------------
>
>                 Key: WICKET-8
>                 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-8
>             Project: Wicket
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: wicket
>    Affects Versions: 1.2.3, 1.3
>            Reporter: Alastair Maw
>         Assigned To: Johan Compagner
>            Priority: Blocker
>         Attachments: ResourceTestPage.html, ResourceTestPage.java
>
>
> I have a bunch of custom image thumbnails that each take a little while to 
> serve up.
> With lots of them on the page at once I'm seeing what looks like a deadlock 
> going on for the session objects. 1.2.2 didn't do this.
> Here's an edited thread-dump. There are lots of these:
> "http-8080-Processor26" daemon prio=1 tid=0x08875a60 nid=0x5480 waiting for 
> monitor entry [0xa5ef9000..0xa5efee60]
>       at 
> wicket.request.compound.DefaultRequestTargetResolverStrategy.resolve(DefaultRequestTargetResolverStrategy.java:102)
>       - waiting to lock <0xab6ee028> (a com.foo.MyWebSession)
>       at 
> wicket.request.compound.AbstractCompoundRequestCycleProcessor.resolve(AbstractCompoundRequestCycleProcessor.java:48)
>       at wicket.RequestCycle.step(RequestCycle.java:992)
>       at wicket.RequestCycle.steps(RequestCycle.java:1084)
>       at wicket.RequestCycle.request(RequestCycle.java:454)
>       at wicket.protocol.http.WicketServlet.doGet(WicketServlet.java:219)
>       [...]
> One of these:
> "http-8080-Processor23" daemon prio=1 tid=0x082a7988 nid=0x547a waiting for 
> monitor entry [0xa5af8000..0xa5afd0e0]
>       at wicket.RequestCycle.processEventsAndRespond(RequestCycle.java:929)
>       - waiting to lock <0xab6ee028> (a com.foo.MyWebSession)
>       at wicket.RequestCycle.step(RequestCycle.java:1010)
>       at wicket.RequestCycle.steps(RequestCycle.java:1084)
>       at wicket.RequestCycle.request(RequestCycle.java:454)
>       at wicket.protocol.http.WicketServlet.doGet(WicketServlet.java:219)
>       [...]
> And one of these:
> "http-8080-Processor20" daemon prio=1 tid=0x082a6978 nid=0x5116 in 
> Object.wait() [0xa57f2000..0xa57f7160]
>       at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
>       - waiting on <0xab7695c8> (a java.util.HashMap)
>       at wicket.Session.getPage(Session.java:427)
>       - locked <0xab7695c8> (a java.util.HashMap)
>       at 
> wicket.request.compound.DefaultRequestTargetResolverStrategy.resolveRenderedPage(DefaultRequestTargetResolverStrategy.java:215)
>       at 
> wicket.request.compound.DefaultRequestTargetResolverStrategy.resolve(DefaultRequestTargetResolverStrategy.java:152)
>       - locked <0xab6ee028> (a com.foo.MyWebSession)
>       at 
> wicket.request.compound.AbstractCompoundRequestCycleProcessor.resolve(AbstractCompoundRequestCycleProcessor.java:48)
>       at wicket.RequestCycle.step(RequestCycle.java:992)
>       at wicket.RequestCycle.steps(RequestCycle.java:1084)
>       at wicket.RequestCycle.request(RequestCycle.java:454)
>       at wicket.protocol.http.WicketServlet.doGet(WicketServlet.java:219)
>       [...]
> Let me know if you need any more info. I can probably make an example webapp 
> if required, but hopefully this will be sufficient.
> As far as I'm concerned it's pretty critical, as the entire session falls 
> over and never recovers, so I'm marking it as a blocker. Hope that's OK.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to