[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-767?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12513838
]
Eelco Hillenius commented on WICKET-767:
----------------------------------------
I've seen Gafter talk about it on his blog, but is that through now?
Anyway, *I* would love to start coding with Scala. That language is seriously
cool. Too bad it currently looks and feels like a project for academics (in
order words, they don't seem to focus much on getting the language out there).
> Generify IModel
> ---------------
>
> Key: WICKET-767
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-767
> Project: Wicket
> Issue Type: Wish
> Reporter: Willis Boyce
> Fix For: 1.4.0-alpha
>
>
> I find myself writing custom IModel implementations that depend on the
> underlying object being some specific type. It would be nice if I could get
> some type safety using generics, e.g.
> class MyCustomModel implements IModel<MyCustomObject>
> {
> MyCustomObject getObject(Component component) { ... }
> ...
> }
> I imagine that this has already been suggested, but I couldn't find a JIRA
> issue about it in the road map.
> I don't think that the core Wicket code would change too much, except in
> cases where the code actually cared what was in the model. Elsewhere it can
> just use IModel<?>.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
