I had no good reason for using EasyMock other than easiness. Please drop it
in favor of WicketTester. If you could commit against trunk that would be
great, because that is what I am developing against now.
thanks,
jim
On 10/13/06, Jean-Baptiste Quenot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* James McLaughlin:
> Great. I just put in a patch. Let me know if it works out for
> you.
Thank you. I committed your work with some adaptations for Wicket
1.2 and JDK < 1.5 in wicket-stuff's WICKET_1_2 branch. I still
have to commit your patch in trunk.
BTW I had to use WicketTester instead of EasyMock because Wicket
1.2 has no interface for Response. Do you think EasyMock
still makes sense for trunk, or can we drop it in favour of
WicketTester? I don't immediately see the benefit of adding yet
another library, but I can be wrong?
--
Jean-Baptiste Quenot
aka John Banana Qwerty
http://caraldi.com/jbq/
