yes, +1 for waiting. Juergen
On 10/23/06, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1 with igor here.. On 10/23/06, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > lets hold off as much as possible - maintaining two branches with > different > package names will be that much more pita > > -Igor > > > On 10/22/06, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > When would be a good time to move the wicket packages to > org.apache.wicket > > ? > > > > I guess we could hold off for a while, until we are more entrenched in > > the incubator and when we have 1.2.3 out the door (otherwise applying > > patches would be harder). > > > > As per proposal, I would only want to move wicket-2 to the new apache > > namespace. > > > > Martijn > > > > -- > > <a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket";>Vote</a> > > for <a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/stuff/wicket > > ">Wicket</a> > > at the <a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/";>Best Stuff in > > the World!</a> > > > >
