+1 Juergen
On 10/25/06, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think we should add such a class or extend links behavior. This question comes up what, once a month? And I believe some committers (Johan?) have said they would like such a component too. Eelco On 10/25/06, Korbinian Bachl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Martinj, > > well, i like frameworks that let me do what i want but also i like them if > they take me the full 9 yards... > > Regards > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > > Von: Martijn Dashorst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Gesendet: Montag, 23. Oktober 2006 20:17 > > An: [email protected] > > Betreff: Re: Feature Idea / Request > > > > Hi Korbinian, > > > > I have several problems with this proposal: > > - the link class now has just one purpose: being a link. It > > knows how to attach itself to a markup tag and how to make > > the link stuff work. > > Automagically adding the label opens up the can of worms for > > all links. > > - the link class can contain *any* markup, not just labels > > - you propose a mere convenience that can be easiliy > > implemented in your own custom class: > > public MyOwnLabeledBookmarkableLink extends BookmarkablePageLink { > > public MyOwnLabeledBoomarkableLink(id, pageparameters, > > IModel label) { > > super(id, pageparameters); > > this.label = label; > > } > > protected void onComponentTagBody(final MarkupStream > > markupStream, final ComponentTag openTag) > > { > > replaceComponentTagBody(markupStream, openTag, > > label.getObject(this).toString()); > > } > > } > > > > One of the goals of Wicket is to be able to create reusable > > components yourself, and this is a perfect case for that. > > Another goal is to keep the framework small and focused, not > > the whole nine yards. > > > > Martijn > > > > > > On 10/22/06, Korbinian Bachl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > i've come over a point where i think it might be useful to make a > > > thing easier. Im talking about BookmarkablePageLink. > > > > > > Usually a link consists of following in html: <a > > > href="URL">DESCRIPTION</a> > > > > > > while in Wicket a BookmarkablePageLink only (!) alters the > > URL, e.g: a > > > BPL has to be: > > > <a href="#" wicket:id="myLinkId"><span > > > wicket:id="myLinkLabel">foo</span></a> > > > > > > couldnt this be simplfied to just: > > > <a href="#" wicket:id="myLinkId">foo</a> > > > > > > and the constructor could then be: > > > public BookmarkablePageLink(final String id, final Class pageClass, > > > final PageParameters parameters, final String linkDescription) > > > > > > > > > wouldnt this be a bit nicer? > > > > > > ive come over this as i create a list with links, but without a > > > description it makes no sense, e.g: > > > > > > List navList = new ArrayList(); > > > navList.add(new BookmarkablePageLink("linkTo",A.class).add(new > > > Label("linkName","FOOA"))); > > > navList.add(new BookmarkablePageLink("linkTo",B.class).add(new > > > Label("linkName","FOO HSH"))); > > > navList.add(new BookmarkablePageLink("linkTo",C.class).add(new > > > Label("linkName","FOO BAR BAR"))); > > > > > > just my 2 cents, > > > > > > Best Regards, > > > > > > Korbinian > > > > > > PS: if im wrong anywhere please let me know! > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > <a > > href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket">Vote</a> > > for <a > > href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/stuff/wicket">Wicket</a> > > at the <a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/">Best > > Stuff in the World!</a> > > > >
