it can be constants in 1.3 shish -igor
On 10/29/06, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Enums are not available in java 1.4 :) Martijn On 10/29/06, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > i guess so and maybe back port to 1.3 if wanted/needed. > > johan > > > On 10/29/06, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > This is 2.0 I figure? > > > > Martijn > > > > On 10/29/06, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > enum is fine as long as we still have the method w/out it that uses our > > > default one > > > > > > -igor > > > > > > > > > On 10/29/06, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Like > > > > > > > > WebApplication.moundBookmarkablePage(Stirng, Class, Enum) > > > > > > > > where enum is one of the 3 (or 4 if we make a hybrid between query and > > > > indexed coding strategy) > > > > or > > > > WebApplication.moundBookmarkablePage(Stirng, Class, Class) > > > > > > > > where class is one of the CodingStrategies the problem with this is > > that > > > > then: > > > > public final void mount(String path, IRequestTargetUrlCodingStrategy > > > > encoder) > > > > > > > > can just as easy be used. > > > > > > > > So i am +1 for the Enum or if anybody has a better idea? > > > > > > > > johan > > > > > > > > > > > > On 10/29/06, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > as far as the vote went i am going to summarize that it did not pass > > > > with > > > > > binding votes being > > > > > > > > > > 0 +1 > > > > > 4 +0 > > > > > 1 -1 > > > > > > > > > > all further discussion should probably happen in a different thread > > > > > > > > > > -igor > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 10/27/06, Korbinian Bachl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > as many people need nice URLs in some cases and these should be > > > > perfect > > > > > to > > > > > > the thing the developer wants, I hereby request to set the default > > URL > > > > > > codingstrategy for BookmarkablePageLink to > > > > IndexedParamUrlCodingStrategy > > > > > > instead of the current default. > > > > > > > > > > > > For the exact Reasons and more infos, please see the Thread "my > > > > Feature > > > > > > Request/ Idea + now proposal (nice URLs)" on this mailinglist. > > > > > > > > > > > > [-1] No! - The current default (/paramname/paramvalue) is better > > IMHO > > > > > > [ 0] I don't care > > > > > > [+1] YES ! - I prefer /value1/value2 and dont want more URL > > > > discussions! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Best Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > Korbinian > > > > > > > > > > > > PS: this is my 1st Vote. If i've made any mistakes please let me > > know. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > <a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket ">Vote</a> > > for <a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/stuff/wicket > > ">Wicket</a> > > at the <a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/";>Best Stuff in > > the World!</a> > > > > -- <a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket";>Vote</a> for <a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/stuff/wicket ">Wicket</a> at the <a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/";>Best Stuff in the World!</a>
