I am also in the 'separate forms - separate submits' camp. It is
probably easier to call the submit for the inside form using a child
visitor than it is to circumvent it.

The reason is: encapsulation. The nested form is a separate unit of
work. And what would you do if you have 3 or 4 forms nested? Call them
all? Which one would 'win' if a setResponsePage() was done?

Martijn

On 11/5/06, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well, nothing is carved into stone. If more people think that the forms
should be treated as separate, so be it.

Do you think there should be a vote? If so can someone formulate one?

-Matej

Johan Compagner wrote:
> hmm, i don't know.
> its a difficult one.
>
> I think they are really separate you could implement it this way that
> really
> only the form is submitted.
>
> For example i have a Search Form component that is in my outer form.
> and that form has really standalone behavior. if you fill in the field and
> press search then something is searched for
> But the outer form is editing data  so if i submit that form i really don't
> want to search.
>
> That kind of example make me choose for only call the submit of the form
> that is really submitted
> if it is outer or inner..
>
> johan
>
>
>
> On 11/4/06, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Johan Compagner wrote:
>> > what do you mean extend the inner form? as in java extend?
>> > Why should you do that as developer. then just have one form. What does
>> > that
>> > inner do then?
>> >
>> > It should be just 2 seperate forms (on the java side)
>> > and if possible we should know what button (so what form) is submitted
>> so
>> > that only one is processed
>> > The other should keep the rawinput for the next render.
>> Yeah. This is basically what currently happens. The question is, when
>> outer form is submitted, what should the nested form do. I personally
>> think that it should be processed to. There is a parent-child
>> relationship, they are not isolated.
>>
>> If you have form a, and then form b and c inside a, you submit b, the
>> form c should not be processed (though rawinput should be kept).
>>
>> But if you submit a, I think that both b and c should be processed.
>>
>> -Matej
>> >
>> > johan
>> >
>> >
>> > On 11/4/06, Korbinian Bachl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> hmm.. I like that idea. If this is a wicket only thing, you might want
>> to
>> >> let the programmer decide what should be  happening.. perhaps the
>> outer
>> >> form
>> >> has to extend the inner one if it should be  act like 1 big form, if
>> you
>> >> dont extend it, they are acting as 2 own forms instead?
>> >>
>> >> Regards
>> >>
>> >> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>> >> > Von: Matej Knopp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> > Gesendet: Samstag, 4. November 2006 18:38
>> >> > An: [email protected]
>> >> > Betreff: Re: AW: Nested forms
>> >> >
>> >> > Indeed, nesting html forms it not allowed. Therefore we have
>> >> > nested forms support in 2.0. If you nest form copmonents, the
>> >> > inner <form tags will be replaced by <div>s.
>> >> >
>> >> > When the inner form is submitted, it actually means
>> >> > submitting the outerform, but only the fieds from inner form
>> >> > will be validated and updated.
>> >> >
>> >> > -Matej
>> >> >
>> >> > Korbinian Bachl wrote:
>> >> > > Emm, Martinj,
>> >> > >
>> >> > > im not sure but as far as I know, nested forms are not allowed in
>> >> > > HTML3, 4 and XHTML 1.0 and 1.1. Furthermore, as its not allowed
>> you
>> >> > > dont know what the browser will do.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Regards
>> >> > >
>> >> > >> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>> >> > >> Von: Martijn Dashorst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> > >> Gesendet: Samstag, 4. November 2006 17:49
>> >> > >> An: Wicket Development
>> >> > >> Betreff: Nested forms
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> I was surprised to see the nested forms working, but I have a
>> >> > >> question on what happens with the inner form inputs when the
>> outer
>> >> > >> form is
>> >> > >> submitted:
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> <form wicket:id="outer">
>> >> > >>     <input type="text" wicket:id="field" />
>> >> > >>     <form wicket:id="inner">
>> >> > >>         <input type="text" wicket:id="field" />
>> >> > >>         <input type="submit" wicket:id="innerSave" />
>> >> > >>     </form>
>> >> > >>     <input type="submit" wicket:id="outerSave" /> </form>
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> public class MyPage extends WebPage {
>> >> > >>     private String inner;
>> >> > >>     private String outer;
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >>     public MyPage() {
>> >> > >>         Form outer = new Form(this, "outer");
>> >> > >>         new TextField(outer, "field", new PropertyModel(this,
>> >> > >> "outer"));
>> >> > >>         Form inner = new Form(outer, "inner");
>> >> > >>         new TextField(inner, "field", new PropertyModel(this,
>> >> > >> "inner"));
>> >> > >>         new Button(outer, "outerSave") {};
>> >> > >>         new Button(inner, "innerSave") {};
>> >> > >>     }
>> >> > >> }
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> If the user clicks the inner button, only the inner fields are
>> >> > >> processed.
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> If the user clicks the outer button, both the inner and
>> >> > outer fields
>> >> > >> are processed, but the inner forms 'onSubmit' is not called.
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> Two questions:
>> >> > >>  1. should the inner fields be processed and update their models?
>> >> > >>  2. should the inner onSubmit/onError be called when the outer is
>> >> > >> submitted?
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> Martijn
>> >> > >> --
>> >> > >> <a
>> >> > >>
>> >> >
>> href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket";>Vote</a>
>> >> > >> for <a
>> >> > >>
>> >> > href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/stuff/wicket";>Wicket</a>
>> >> > >> at the <a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/";>Best
>> >> > >> Stuff in the World!</a>
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>>
>




--
<a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket";>Vote</a>
for <a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/stuff/wicket";>Wicket</a>
at the <a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/";>Best Stuff in
the World!</a>

Reply via email to