+1 to branch But branch then the current stream. We already have a version tag i presume?
johan On 11/5/06, Frank Bille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The only thing is that I have committed something to 1.x which idealy should go into 1.2.4. I also think Matej has?! Should we then just recommit these things to the new 1.2.x or? Frank On 11/5/06, Frank Bille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > +1 > > On 11/1/06, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > sounds good > > > > -igor > > > > > > On 11/1/06, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > I know it is too early to call, but I just wanted to make sure we're > > > on the same page... > > > > > > This weekend is the first week anniversary of our 1.2.3 release, and > > > based on the reactions on the mailinglist it seems quite stable. > > > > > > According to the vote, we would create a branch 1.2.x and start > > > developing 1.3 on branch 1.x. > > > > > > The previous time we branched 1.2.x it got quite a heavy discussion so > > > I want to make sure we all agree this time that creating the branch is > > > welcomed and sustainable. > > > > > > I would like to propose to create the branch from the tag I created on > > > 1.2.3, ensuring that we have a consistent starting point. > > > > > > Ideas, discussions? > > > > > > Martijn > > > > > > -- > > > <a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket > > ">Vote</a> > > > for <a href=" http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/stuff/wicket > > > ">Wicket</a> > > > at the <a href=" http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/";>Best Stuff in > > > the World!</a> > > > > > > > >
