That should be doable, but someone with enough knowledge of XForms, and preferably someone who is actually going to use that should implement it. Maybe you? ;)
Eelco On 11/6/06, Paolo Di Tommaso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Maybe is off topic in this thread, but what about XForm in wicket? http://ibm.com/developerworks/xml/library/x-xformstipmultipleforms/index.html?ca=drs- Do plan to support it in future releases? Bye - Paolo On 11/5/06, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > the idea of me was that the outer form extends the inner - as this is > closes > > to what happens in html. So yo still can process the inner one, as is a > > complete form, but when the outer one is processed, the inner onSubmit > etc. > > is overriden and therefore no other misunderstandings and errors should > > occur. This is also closest to the html form that is coming out - the > inner > > one can be processed, but if you do the outer one then the inner is > > processed too (in case of formouter extends form inner) and solely > processed > > in case of outer form doenst extend inner form. > > > > that is should be 2 seperate form is ok, if the developer wants to tread > > them seperately, if he wants to tread them together, he may use the > outer > > extending the inner. Sounds quite basic and easy to me. > > I wouldn't like to force clients use inheritance here. I think the > nested form use cases would more closely resemble composition and > furthermore, I don't think forcing inheritance would solve a real > problem here. > > Eelco >
