Cool, thanks Johan! Eelco
On 11/8/06, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
i am already busy and i think almost done with: second level caching stateless pages/components delayed session I just have to figure out if i don't forget anything.. johan On 11/8/06, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I think that is a solid idea, but I also want the 1.x branch to follow > > 2.x as closely as possible feature wise. This is also nice for those > > reading the book that things still work as explained in 1.x. > > > > Not everything, but having a similar hierarchy for models would help. > > Having validators work in similar fashion would help too. > > Here is where we disagree though. I'm not for keeping 1.x close to 2.0 > at all. We planned on letting 1.3 be the branch close to 1.2, but with > a couple of fixes and enhancements we couldn't do in 1.2 due to binary > compatibility. A similar hierarchy for models and validators that work > in the same way are in my book not important enough to justify the > time we distract from working on 2.0 and for more API breaks. But > that's just my opinion. If it's on the top of your list, well, this > thread is where you can state that then. I am just hoping that 1.3 > stays close to 1.2 now (I'm sure the readers of Pro Wicket can > appreciate that as well), and that we can put 1.3. in maintenance > state very soon too. > > Eelco >
