Yeah similar to that. I mean we currently even cant employ file-endings. e.g: you can have /page/param/param but not /page/param/param.html wich would be even more nice and logic (IMHO)
imagine a mount where you could specify "/" as begin and ".htm" as end. -> you could have 1 handling-class for all data as well as natural URLs (if you use IndexedURLParams). if / is solely you could return the start page, if /.htm is called wicket knows that it would be the handling-class with empty params...so we also wouldnt crash with any other wicket functionality. e.g: globalmount(".htm", new IndexedUrlParamStrategy("/",handler.class)); so you also would centralise URLs to just 1 class in app wich then can delegate to the resulting pages. was just a thought from what im in now as i need nice URLs and the problems i stumbled in regarding static content, root etc. what do you think about this? - i'm interested in any thoughts about it. Best Regards, Korbinian > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Johan Compagner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gesendet: Montag, 13. November 2006 10:20 > An: wicket-dev@incubator.apache.org > Betreff: Re: Severe Bug in Wicket 2 / WICKET-42 > > So this way? > > / == home page > /?p=a == homepage with page params. > /?interface:xxx == an callback to an existing page > /?bookmarkablePage=xxx == an none mounted bookmarkable page request > /input == mounted bookmarkable page > > and then > > /a == this is not mounted like input above.. Then it should > go to a page that was mounted on /* ?? > So you want to have a fallback to a page? > > johan > > > > On 11/12/06, Korbinian Bachl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Yeah, that is what i mean - > > > > e.g: mount to /*.html -> would mean it goes for /[everything].html > > wich would introduce even more flexibility... > > > > currently, it goes to "/[neededCharacter]" and this catches > > /[neededCharacter][anythingBehind] > > e.g: /a -> > > /a/b is valid > > /aa/b is valid > > /a is valid > > > > as / is mounted for the homepage and you cant mount a > wildcard so far, > > you still need a fixed point you can hook on. > > > > Regards > > > > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > > > Von: Johan Compagner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Gesendet: Sonntag, 12. November 2006 20:15 > > > An: wicket-dev@incubator.apache.org > > > Betreff: Re: Severe Bug in Wicket 2 / WICKET-42 > > > > > > what does a page mounted on /* means in your eyes? > > > /[everything]?? > > > > > > there is no such a thing like wild card mounting. > > > > > > johan > > > > > > > > > On 11/12/06, Korbinian Bachl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Igor, > > > > > > > > yes - but its not mounted to "/*" but to "/" - is it > > > possible to have > > > > the homepage mounted on "/*" ? means that this page gets > > > all path as > > > > indexedURLparams?? > > > > > > > > if i mount it to /* he doesnt see it as wildcard but as > fixed "*" > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > > > > > Von: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > Gesendet: Sonntag, 12. November 2006 18:39 > > > > > An: wicket-dev@incubator.apache.org > > > > > Betreff: Re: Severe Bug in Wicket 2 / WICKET-42 > > > > > > > > > > the homepage is always mounted on / > > > > > > > > > > -igor > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 11/12/06, Korbinian Bachl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Johan, > > > > > > > > > > > > i checked all - everything is now behaving as expected. > > > Great Work! > > > > > > > > > > > > One question however is still to me - why cant i mount a > > > > > page to "/" ? > > > > > > > > > > > > so i could mount a PageDistribution class there which then > > > > > handles the > > > > > > PageParams logic... or would this get in conflict with > > > the rest > > > > > > of wicket ? > > > > > > if so, would it be possible to have a page responsible for > > > > > every path > > > > > > behind / but for /wicket/ where the internal could > be handled ?? > > > > > > > > > > > > i know this aproach is a bit away from what wicket was > > > made for... > > > > > > > > > > > > Rgards > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > > > > > > > Von: Korbinian Bachl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > Gesendet: Sonntag, 12. November 2006 10:32 > > > > > > > An: wicket-dev@incubator.apache.org > > > > > > > Betreff: AW: Severe Bug in Wicket 2 / WICKET-42 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Really fast :) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > i check it out soon and report, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > > > > > > > > Von: Johan Compagner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > Gesendet: Samstag, 11. November 2006 23:17 > > > > > > > > An: wicket-dev@incubator.apache.org > > > > > > > > Betreff: Re: Severe Bug in Wicket 2 / WICKET-42 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > should be fixed now. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 11/11/06, Korbinian Bachl > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > well, it works if it is: > > > > > > > > > a, the first access of the WebApp with no provious > > > > > > > ReDeploy b, the > > > > > > > > > root is accessed then > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > if i redeploy just once, i cant access the > root anymore > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > > > > however the > > > > > > > > > direct path always works... > > > > > > > > > if i redeploy it and access the path before, it chains > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > another danger thing is that following works: > > > > > > > > > assume you have IndexedPageParams and index.class > > > > > > > > > mounted > > > > > > > to /Index: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > if you then access it via /Index/foo/bar/Index/foo2 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and print out pageparams.toString you only > get 0=foo2 , > > > > > > > meaning he > > > > > > > > > access it at last point, and not at first! > > > > > > > > > This violates JEE security !!! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > i also noticed that if you use a servlet and > > > > > > > > BookMarkablePageLinks the > > > > > > > > > URLs look like these > > > 127.0.0.1/<servlet>?param=value - and > > > > > > > > mounting > > > > > > > > > using a servlet was not possible at all > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Best Regards > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Korbinian > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > > > > > > > > > > Von: Johan Compagner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > Gesendet: Samstag, 11. November 2006 17:30 > > > > > > > > > > An: wicket-dev@incubator.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > Betreff: Re: Severe Bug in Wicket 2 / WICKET-42 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > does it always just work if always your > first access > > > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > the root of > > > > > > > > > > your webapp? > > > > > > > > > > So if you redeploy or restart then your > first request > > > > > > > > should be the > > > > > > > > > > root of your webapp. > > > > > > > > > > Then afterwards should everything just work. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is a bug yes i have to rollback code for > > > this because > > > > > > > > > > getServletPath() can't be depended on in a filter > > > > > > > configuration. > > > > > > > > > > Which we do now. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > johan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 11/11/06, Korbinian Bachl > > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I issued a severe BUG > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-42 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Best Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Korbinian > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >