what kind of changes did i do that broke it?
It could be something like that but i am just curious.

johan


On 11/15/06, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Please don't "fix" 1.2.4, unless you are really sure that it's broken. I
suppose the problem with 1.3 is because it's based on johan's brach,
which didn't reflect the last changes in 1.2.4 (when it was still 1.x).
Can this be it?

-Matej

Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> well, pull open AbstractBehavior
>
> currently it looks like this
>
> /**
>     * @see wicket.behavior.IBehavior#rendered(wicket.Component)
>     */
>    public final void rendered(final Component component)
>    {
>        onRendered(component);
>    }
>
> it should call cleanup() after onRendered() but that is obviously
missing.
>
> -igor
>
>
> On 11/15/06, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> strange that the project here (that did run on 1.2.3+) don't have any
>> problems until they used 1.3
>>
>> but anyway fine by me.
>>
>> johan
>>
>> On 11/15/06, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> > it surfaced in 1.3 but is also broken in 1.2.3, i checked before
>> posting
>> > the
>> > vote :)
>> >
>> > -igor
>> >
>> >
>> > On 11/15/06, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > fine by me if we need it, but it surfaced in 1.3 not in 1.2.3..?
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On 11/15/06, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > +1, but was this also a problem in 1.2.3?
>> > > >
>> > > > Martijn
>> > > >
>> > > > On 11/15/06, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > > > > +1
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On 11/14/06, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > [VOTE] backport WICKET-68 to 1.2.4
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > --
>> > > > <a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket
>> > ">Vote</a>
>> > > > for <a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/stuff/wicket
>> > > > ">Wicket</a>
>> > > > at the <a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/";>Best
Stuff
>> in
>> > > > the World!</a>
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>


Reply via email to