no, they both do exactly what they were designed to do. sounds like you need
to create a subclass of repeatingview for your usecase.
-igor
On 11/20/06, Jean-Baptiste Quenot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* Igor Vaynberg:
> think of RepeatingView as an unmanaged ListView. you are in full
> control over how the children are managed.
I just tried RepeatingView, and well, the problem is that as you
say it is totally unmanaged, ie it does not handle a backing List.
So either we need to change ListView, or we have to improve
RepeatingView to handle a backing list.
--
Jean-Baptiste Quenot
aka John Banana Qwerty
http://caraldi.com/jbq/
