Sigh... seems I had some outgoing changes still too. Programming in the evenings != a good idea.
Eelco On 11/22/06, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yeah, sorry about that. Actually I made that change (at least I thought) so that only StringResponse implemented it. Anyway, it seems the response ends up in the session somehow, so we have something to fix there. I got exceptions all over the place when I tried to work on my project yesterday. Eelco > > I think if anyone need to Serialize response (String response), he > should make it's own derivate and make it implement Serializable. > > So this is a vote. Should we remove Serializable from Response? > > Me: +1 > > -Matej >
